Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas in Tasmania

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has released some more data from the 2011 Census that provides information on the socio-economic indexes in areas across Australia.

You can find the data and ABS reports on their website – here.

An article about the data was published in The Sunday Tasmanian, as shown below. To be honest I find parts of the article to be rather dramatic. Every part of Australia (or indeed any country) will have areas that are wealthier and areas which are poorer.

This is great information for government and planners and also can help people when thinking about where to move to in Tasmania.

The ranking for all municipalities in Tasmania are shown below. Note that the higher the number, the greater the level of socio-economic advantage.

To view a map showing the location of all municipalities, see here. And yes, there are a lot…

Tasmanian Municipalities and National Rankings (ABS, Census 2011)

MunicipalityRanking
Hobart497
Kingborough466
West Tamar391
Clarance377
Meander Valley273
King Island241
Flinders240
Latrobe224
Northern Midlands203
Sorell198
Central Coast178
Huon Valley163
Launceston137
Circular Head119
Kentish113
Waratah/Wynyard112
Southern Midlands106
Glamorgan Spring Bay100
Dorset84
Burnie80
Devonport71
Glenorchy69
Tasman63
Central Highlands61
West Coast53
Derwent Valley50
Break O'Day48
George Town41
Brighton39
Source: ABS Socio-Economic INdexes for Areas (SEIFA), Data Cube only, 2011 - Table 2. Local Government Area (LGA) Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage, 2001

 

The suburb rankings, as shown in the print edition of The Sunday Tasmanian, is reproduced below.

Tasmanian Suburbs and Towns National Rankings (ABS, Census 2011)

SuburbRanking
Tolmans Hill8239
Roches Beach8156
Acton Park8115
Fern Tree7601
Taroona7340
Mt Stuart7047
Sandy Bay6607
Woodbridge6221
Lenah Valley5794
Rosny5736
Hobart city5092
Kingston4147
Evandale3958
Launceston city3717
North Hobart3353
Bicheno2061
Swansea1627
Kempton1461
Deloraine1410
Smithton1325
Scottsdale1246
Geeveston864
St Helens814
Oatlands727
Ouse626
Glenorchy548
Bridgewater181
Source: The Sunday Tasmanian, March 31 2013. Note there are 8247 suburbs in the complete list.

 

This story from The Mercury.

State’s wealth gap widens

Tasmania is home to suburbs rated among the most advantaged, and disadvantaged, in Australia.

New Census data show the state’s wealth divide is most stark in the south. Tolmans Hill, in Hobart, is Tasmania’s most advantaged suburb, while the city’s northern suburb of Brighton is among the state’s most needy.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show Tolmans Hill is in Australia’s top 1 per cent of suburbs, followed by Acton Park and Roches Beach, which are in the top 2 per cent, then Tranmere, Ridgeway and Tinderbox in the top 3 per cent.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, Tasmanian municipalities in Australia’s bottom 10 per cent are: George Town, Break O’Day and Brighton. Rocherlea, north of Launceston, was found to be Tasmania’s most disadvantaged suburb and Australia’s 97th. Other suburbs in the bottom 2 per cent level were Cape Barren Island, Gagebrook, Herdsmans Cove, Clarendon Vale and Burnie’s Shorewell Park. Bridgewater and the Launceston suburb of Ravenswood are in the bottom 3 per cent.

The Tasmanian Council of Social Service chief executive Tony Reidy said the divide between rich and poor was no surprise. “When we see those statistics we see there is a great divide between those who are doing well in our state and those who are doing poorly.”

The data are revealed in the 2011 Census social advantage area rankings, which place suburbs according to their access to financial and social resources.

The findings show that municipalities in which just over a third of Tasmania’s population live (about 175,000) are among Australia’s top third of areas with a socio-economic advantage. That relatively well-off set lives in Hobart, Kingborough, Clarence, Meander Valley and West Tamar. These residents have the greatest access to material and social resources, and the greatest ability to participate in society.

But there is a sharp divide between those and other Tasmanian municipalities, all of which are in the bottom half of the rankings.

About 59,000 Tasmanians living in the Sorell, Northern Midlands, Latrobe, King Island, Flinders Island and Central Coast municipalities were in that bottom half, but were significantly ahead of the remaining 261,000 Tasmanians, who were all living in areas ranked in the bottom third.

ABS Methodology Data Management Division director Phillip Gould, said the Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas analyses were intended to help government decision makers. “It provides assessments of the welfare of Australian communities and helps in determining areas that require funding and services,” Dr Gould said.

Mr Reidy said TasCOSS’s submission to the State Government ahead of the coming Budget highlighted the growing gap between rich and poor in Tasmania. He said that between 14 and 24 per cent of Tasmanians lived either in poverty or on the cusp of it, and 34 per cent of Tasmanian households relied on some form of Commonwealth benefit as their principal source of income. Mr Reidy said the Census data should act as a “wake-up call” to Government. “The solution requires strong and continued social investment in education, health, transport and communications,” he said.

The Census data show Australia’s most advantaged suburbs are mostly in WA and NSW, while Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory and Queensland fare the worst.

Is this the sort of information you would take into account in deciding where to live in Tasmania?

Jo

Photo credit: Tasmanian Devil | Tourism Tasmania | Chris McLennan

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave A Comment